Method For Producing Frozen Dough

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides a method for producing frozen dough which can be directly transferred from freezer to oven without a proofing or thawing step. The process comprises mixing the dough ingredients, forming gas nucleation sites, exercising the dough by subjecting to cycles of pressure differentials and freezing the dough. The frozen product can be transferred directly from the freezer to an oven for baking.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.11/641,300, filed on Dec. 18, 2006, which in turn claims priority toU.S. Provisional application No. 60/753,518, filed on Dec. 23, 2005, thedisclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to frozen dough and moreparticularly provides a method for producing frozen dough which can betransferred directly from the freezer to an oven for baking. The frozendough product can be baked in a regular oven or in a combination oventhat utilizes a combination of modalities such as convection, microwave,infrared and the like in the presence or absence of mechanicalstretching during baking.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The traditional process of baking includes mixing of ingredients,kneading of dough, dividing the dough into smaller portions, shaping andmolding of dough pieces, proofing it to a particular volume, and baking.This process is cumbersome, time-consuming, and requires appropriateequipments and qualified bakers for manufacturing bread of organolepticcharacteristics that are typical of freshly-baked bread. In order tominimize time and problems related to bread-baking, fully or par-bakedbreads were introduced. However, such products lack the characteristicsof freshly-baked bread. In order to minimize preparation time and stillprovide freshly-baked bread, frozen doughs gained popularity infood-service, in-store bakeries, as well as home-baking.

Based on the method of production, frozen doughs are available indifferent forms, viz. pre-proofed or un-proofed frozen dough with orwithout the use of chemical leavening agents. A pre-proofed frozen doughsystem includes proofing of dough before it is frozen (U.S. Pat. No.6,660,311). Such products are susceptible to damage during shipping andhandling, and hence are lesser popular as compared to their un-proofedcounterparts. In the un-proofed frozen dough system, the dough isseparated into dough pieces and then frozen. The obtained frozen doughhas a longer shelf life (˜100 days or more at 0-5° F.), and is shippedin its frozen state to the food-service and in-store bakeries.

In a typical baking operation that utilizes frozen dough products, thefrozen products are placed in a retarder or refrigerator (˜4 to 6° C.)for two to sixteen hours for thawing, and then for an additional one totwo hours for proofing, followed by baking. This can be wasteful,because the bakeries have to presume the amount of product they mightneed for sale at least 3 hours before baking. In addition, qualifiedbakers are still needed to identify the time at which proofing should bestopped and baking should be commenced. Essentially, in order to usefrozen dough products, a bakery operation would need to invest inequipments (such as Freezer, Retarder, Proofer, and oven), and stillhave a qualified baker on the floor. Ironically, frozen dough systemsare an expensive proposition as compared to the bread making thatincludes mixing of ingredients, and kneading of dough; but still anattractive proposition because of its convenience and cleanliness.

Hence, to address the issues of reducing cost of baking bread tocustomers and still providing frozen dough products with theirfreshly-baked quality, frozen dough manufacturers have been trying todevelop a product that can preferably be transferred directly from thefreezer to the oven. Certain approaches to obtain such freezer-to-ovenproducts include use of lamination and/or chemical leavening systems(U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,554; U.S. Pat. No. 6,589,583). While lamination andchemical leaveners provide acceptable croissant or cookie-type products,they do not provide a bread-like product with flavor and crumb structurethat is typical of bread. Another approach for reducing the cost ofbaking is by reducing time at each step or elimination of a step in theprocess when a frozen product is thawed in a retarder, proofed in aproofer, and then baked in an oven. In one frozen dough system, thefrozen dough does not require a conventional proofing (or proofer) stepprior to baking. The frozen dough is thawed in a retarder at 33 to 42°F. for at least 12 hours, or at an elevated temperature of 43 to 85° F.for at least 1 hour, and then baked to give a product with goodorganoleptic quality and a specific volume of at least 4 cc/g (US2005/0202126). While research so-far has been conducted to recognize theessential compositional attributes that are desired for freezer-to-ovenbread or bread-like products (U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,443), the processingand exact ingredient balance in the formulation to produce such productsis not known so far.

Davis (1973) patented a method for preparing storage-stable bakeryproducts within hermetically sealed containers that were capable ofbeing cooked in the sealed container (U.S. Pat. No. 3,718,483).Application JP 2000-287607 describes a method for preparation of frozendough where fermentation was carried out in a low vacuum state, anddough was further kneaded under pressure. The final product was lesssusceptible to generation of a “pear-like” skin, and improved thetexture of the bread. U.S. Pat. No. 6,025,001 describes a process inwhich pre-shaped, unfrozen dough was expanded in size and baked underreduced pressure. Because of the said processes of thawing and proofingof frozen dough at reduced pressure, the overall time of bread baking atthe bakery is not reduced, and the product cannot be considered afreezer-to-oven product.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

All percentages included in this specification and claims representweight percentages based on the flour weight unless indicated otherwise.

The present invention describes the processing conditions, where breadmade from a dough was exposed to pressure differential prior tofreezing, to produce a product that can be baked directly from thefreezer to the oven to give a product with good quality and a bakedspecific volume of at least 4.0 cc/g.

This invention provides a method for producing frozen dough which can bedirectly transferred from the freezer to an oven. The dough comprisesflour, fat, water, leavening agent or agents, emulsifiers andstabilizers. In one embodiment, the leavening agent is yeast. The yeastmay be present up to 3 times the traditional amount of one or moreyeasts with activity in the temperature range of 33-140° F. The yeast ispresent in an amount from 7-14%. In one embodiment, the yeast content is8-12%. In another embodiment, the yeast content is 11%. The glutencontent of the dough should be in the range of from 10 to 20% (w/w) ofthe flour, with higher gluten levels generally giving a dough withbetter gas-holding ability. Typically, flour sold as “high gluten”generally contains about 12.5 to 15% gluten. However, it is to beunderstood that gluten levels can fluctuate from product to product orseason to season. If desired, high-gluten flour can be used as the onlyflour in the dough, or it can be used with other flours.

The method of preparing the dough comprises introducing “gas nucleationsites” in the dough, followed by exercising the dough. While notintending to be bound by any particular theory, it is considered thatexercising the dough affects the gas nucleation sites and results inrestructuring of the dough matrix. In one embodiment, the dough matrixis stretched along one axis and allowed to relax in the same axis tocreate a dough matrix that can be baked without any pre-baking, thawing,proofing and other treatment, to obtain a baked product with goodflavor, uniform crumb, consistent crust formation, and a baked specificvolume of at least 4.0 cc/g. The dough of the present invention can beconveniently used in bakeries and restaurants.

The frozen dough of the present invention advantageously can be baked ina conventional oven, such as a convection-rack oven. Because of this,the product can be conveniently used in bakeries, restaurants and thelike where there is a need for quick baking of the product using routineequipment. The frozen dough of the present invention can also be bakedin an oven which provides a combination of one or more modes of heatingsuch as direct fire, heated oil, forced air, convection, microwaveand/or infrared.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIGS. 1A and 1B are representations of the number of air cells havingthe indicated area in dough which has not been subjected to exercising(1A) or from dough which has been subjected to exercising (1B).

FIGS. 2A and 2B are representations of the air cells from FIG. 1expressed as percent of total air cells as a function of air cell areain dough which has not been subjected to exercising (2A) or from doughwhich has been subjected to exercising (2B).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention will now be described in detail for specificpreferred embodiments of the invention, it being understood that theseembodiments are intended only as illustrative examples and the inventionis not to be limited thereto.

Frozen Dough

The present invention relates to frozen dough that does not requirethawing and proofing prior to baking. The dough of the inventionincludes flour, water, yeast, and/or chemical leavening agents,emulsifiers and one or more dough stabilizers to produce dough of suchresilience that it can endure the necessary processing before freezingand acquire the desired rheological properties during baking.

The gluten content of the dough should be in the range of from 10 to 20wt %, with higher gluten levels generally giving a dough with bettergas-holding ability. For hard rolls, the gluten content is in the rangeof from 12-20%.

Typically, flour sold as “high gluten” generally contains about 12.5 to15% gluten. However, it is to be understood that gluten levels canfluctuate from product to product or season to season. If desired,high-gluten flour can be used as the only flour in the dough, or it canbe used with other flours.

Flours which can be used in the doughs of the present invention include,but are not limited to, wheat flour, potato flour and bread flour, orcombinations and mixtures thereof. The flour of the present inventionmay be enriched flour, i.e., flour that contains federally mandatedamounts of flour, niacin, ferrous sulfate, riboflavin, enzyme, andthiamine mononitrate folate. Other types of flours may be substitutedfor the enriched flour or used in combination with enriched flour.

The dough of the present invention may comprise additional gluten orgluten hydrolysates. Gluten is known to contain gliadin and glutenin.Accordingly, these individual components or combinations thereof may beused instead of gluten. The gliadin may be alpha, beta, gamma or omegagliadin or combinations thereof.

The dough of the present invention may include flour from one or moregrains (such as oats, corn, barley, wheat, rye and the like). The doughmay include particulate materials from the grains (such as crushed wheatparticles). Further, the dough may also include whole seeds or crushedseeds. Useful seeds are well known in the art and include sunflowerseeds, caraway seeds, flax seeds, sesame seeds and the like. Thus,multigrain products can be prepared to improve the taste and/or to addnutritional value.

Sufficient water may be added to the present doughs to achieve thedesired consistency. The precise amount of water depends on factorsknown to those skilled in the art, including the type of yeast used, thedesired final product, and the amount and type of other ingredients.Water can be added in an amount of about 45 wt % to about 75 wt %, onflour weight basis.

The frozen dough of the present invention comprises one or more types ofyeast. Yeast can be purchased and used in different forms. The driestcommonly used yeast, sometimes referred to as “instant” yeast, contains3.5-6.0% moisture. Cream yeast contains about 80-85% moisture;compressed yeast contains about 66-73% moisture; and active dry yeastcontains about 6-8% moisture. Other examples include baker's yeast,protected active dry yeast, frozen yeast and the like. Generally,compressed yeast can be used. However, the invention is in no waylimited to compressed yeast. For a given quantity of compressed yeast,one of ordinary skill in the art could easily determine the “compressedyeast equivalent,” i.e., the quantity of another form of yeast having adifferent degree of hydration than compressed yeast, but containing thesame amount of yeast as the given quantity of compressed yeast. Forexample, 1% compressed yeast is equivalent to about 1.5-1.8% creamyeast, which is equivalent to about 0.375-0.5% active dry, which isequivalent to about 0.3125-0.4% instant yeast.

Alternatively, or additionally, chemical leavening can also be used.Chemical leavening typically involves using leavening agents (such assodium acid phosphate (SAPP) or sodium aluminum phosphate (SALP)) withbaking soda or a combination thereof.

Gas nucleation sites may be formed in the dough or in a furtherembodiment, the gas nucleation sites may be introduced into the dough byany means. The bubbles in a gas nucleation site may be of any suitablegas or a combination of gases such as compressed air, CO₂, nitrogen andthe like.

The dough of the present invention preferably comprises salt. Salt isgenerally added to promote better mixing, enhance flavoring, controlmoisture content within the dough, and/or to control yeast activity. Anycommercially available fine-blending salt may be used.

The dough of the present invention also comprises an effective type andamount of a lipid source. In one embodiment, oil is used. In general,most edible oils are suitable, but vegetable oil is preferred due to itstaste and lubrication properties, as well as its lack of trans fat.Examples of vegetable oils that may be used in accordance with thepresent invention, include, but are not limited to, soybean oil,cottonseed oil, peanut oil, canola oil, corn oil, olive oil andsunflower oil. Flavored oils may also be used in addition to or in placeof the oil of the present invention. Non-limiting examples of flavoredoils include olive, sesame, ginger and the like. In one embodiment, afat or shortening that has a sharp melting point with high initialsoftening point is used.

Lipid sources may include emulsified oils. Examples of such emulsifiedoils are shortening, butter or margarine. Glyceride shortenings derivedfrom animal or vegetable fats and oils including synthetically preparedshortenings are suitable for use herein. The glyceride may containsaturated or unsaturated long chain acyl radicals having from about 12to about 22 carbon atoms generally obtained from edible oils and fatssuch as corn oil, cottonseed oil, soybean oil, coconut oil, rapeseedoil, peanut oil, olive oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, sunflower seedoil, wall flower oil, lard, tallow and the like. Examples of preferredshortenings according to the present invention, include vegetableshortenings, soybean based shortenings or oils, hydrogenatedsoybean-based shortening or oil, corn oil, palm oil, hydrogenated palmoil, lard and tallow oils.

Hydrogenated shortening may be used if a slight crispiness to theoutside of the cooked dough is desired. The hydrogenated shorteningprovides better crust definition, crispiness and better baked volume.Vegetable shortening that may be used in accordance with the presentinvention is preferably in the form of shortening flakes. Hydrogenatedshortening is preferably used at a low concentration to minimize transfat related issues.

The amount and type of fat source may be selected by those skilled inthe art based on various factors including the ingredients of the frozendough, and based on the desired taste and physical characteristics, suchas maintaining a consistent internal structure.

The dough of the present invention comprises emulsifiers between 0.05%to 0.5% or higher as permissible under the FDA guidelines. Suitableemulsifiers include lecithin, hydroxylated lecithin; mono, di, orpolyglycerides of fatty acids, such as stearin and palmitin mono anddyglycerides, polyoxyethylene ethers of fatty esters of polyhydricalcohols, such as the polyoxyethylene ethers of sorbitan distearate;fatty esters of polyhydric alcohols such as sorbitan monostearate;polyglycerol esters of mono and dyglycerides such as hexaglyceryldistearate; mono- and diesters of glycols such as propylene glycolmonostearate, and propylene glycol monopalmitate, succinoylatedmonoglycerides; and the esters of carboxylic acids such as lactic,citric, and tartaric acids with the mono- and diglycerides of fattyacids such as glycerol lacto palmitate and glycerol lacto stearate, andcalcium or sodium stearoyl lactylates (SSL) and all members of thesucrose ester family thereof, all varieties of diacetyltartaric estersof fatty acids, diacetyl tartaric acid ester of monoglyceride(“DATEMS”), and the like, and mixtures thereof.

The dough of the present invention includes one or more stabilizerswhich are typically hydrophilic colloids. These can be natural, i.e.vegetable, or synthetic gums and may be, for example, carrageenan, guargum, locust bean gum, alginate, xanthan gum and the like orsemi-synthetic such as methylcellulose, carboxy-methylcellulose,ethylcellulose, hydroxy-propylmethylcellulose (METHOCEL F-50 HG), andmicrocrystalline cellulose. Typically, a gum or combination of gums isemployed with a sugar, e.g., dextrose carrier. The amount of thesestabilizers for this product is between 0.2 to 1.6% or higher, aspermissible under FDA guidelines.

The dough of the present invention may also include flavoring and/orcoloring agents. The dough may optionally contain suitable amounts of,for example 0.01 to 0.5%, flavoring agents and/or coloring agents. Whenusing flavorings, the amount of water and salt used in the dough mayhave to be adjusted to take into account, for example, the amount ofsalt and water already contained in the flavoring. It is believed that“fine tuning” of the amount of salt and water in the dough would bewithin the ability of one of ordinary skill in the art. An example of asuitable flavoring is butter flavor and fermented flavor. It will beappreciated by those skilled in the art that many different individualflavors can be used to achieve the ultimate desired flavor.

Vitamin and minerals may also be added to the dough as desired.Riboflavin is a commonly added vitamin to the dough. Vitamins andminerals may be added as enriched flour or added individually. Inaddition, calcium in absorbable or elemental form may also be added.

Sweeteners may be added to the present dough to provide for textureand/or flavor. Sweeteners such as sugars may be added for the additionalpurpose of providing a source of energy for the yeast. In oneembodiment, dextrose and/or other sugars such as sucrose, crystallinefructose, high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) or a combination of thesesugars may be used. Alternatively or additionally artificial sweetenerssuch as aspartame, saccharine, sucralose, alitame, cyclamate and thelike may also be used.

If desired, the dough of the present invention may contain oxidants suchas azodicarbonamide, potassium iodate and the like.

The ingredients of the present invention may be included as acombination. For example, a dough conditioner combination comprising oneor more of the following may be used: oxidants, enzymes, emulsifiers,stabilizers, flour and oil. A non-limiting example of such a conditioneris Tolerance Plus. The dough conditioner may also contain ascorbic acid(Tolerance Plus with AA). Other dough conditioners include Panodan,potassium bromate ingredient (PBRI) and azo dicarbon amide (ADA). Doughconditioners can be used in a wide range of weight percents, as long astheir presence and amount does not cause the specific volume of thebaked product to be less than 4 cc/gm. An acceptable range for mostconditioners is in the range of from 0.3 to 2 flour wt %.

If desired, the dough of the present invention may also compriseenzymes. The enzymes may be selected from a group including, but notlimited to, amylase, hemicellulase, glucose oxidase, xylanase and thelike. Determination of the amount and type of enzyme is well within thepurview of those skilled in the art. Use of enzymes, such as amylasesmay be advantageous in that they may retard staling of the frozen doughor the resulting rolls, breads and the like. Enzymes may also result inan increased strength, improved extensiblity or elasticity, stabilityand reduced stickiness of the dough, thus resulting in improvedmachinability during manufacture. The effect on the dough may beparticularly advantageous when a lower content gluten flour is used. Theimproved machinability is of particular importance in connection withdough which is to be processed industrially. The amount and type ofenzyme of the present invention may be determined by those skilled inthe art depending on the specific desired resulting properties.

The dough of the present invention may include reducing agents,particularly for more flow in the oven. Suitable reducing agentsinclude, but are not limited to, L-cysteine and glutathione. It isbelieved that the reducing agents contribute to the high gluten doughbecoming more malleable.

After addition of all or some of the ingredients, dough mixing isperformed. Preferably, the dough is shaped into a desired shape such as,a square, other polygons, or round, or rolled into rolls. For example,flat dough pieces are rolled out for pizza.

Preparation of Dough

In the first step, the ingredients of the dough are combined together.The combining step may include either combining all of the ingredientsat once or combining different combinations of ingredients first andthen combining all of the ingredients together. For example, accordingto one embodiment, certain ingredients are combined to form a pre-mix,including for example, the salt, stabilizers and sugar. Then, thepre-mix is combined with the remaining ingredients including the flour,yeast, water and lipid source. The pre-mix and/or the final mixture mayinclude one or more additional ingredients as set forth herein.

According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, thecombining step includes mixing all the ingredients. The ingredients maybe mixed with one another by mixing methods generally known in the art.

After combining the ingredients, they are then mixed (or further mixedif mixing steps have already taken place) by any suitable mixingapparatus, such as a Hobart mixer. By way of example only, theingredients are mixed for about 1 to about 4 minutes on a first speed(low) and then for about 7 to about 20 minutes on a second speed (high),which is faster than the first speed. Preferably, the ingredients aremixed for about 2 minutes on low speed and for about 8-12 minutes onhigh speed.

The dough is then divided into small pieces and may be panned. Afterpreparation of the dough, the dough is held in “ambient conditions” for1-60 minutes. This step is termed herein as resting. In one embodiment,the dough may be held at higher than ambient humidity and temperature.In a preferred embodiment, the dough is held for 5-40 minutes morepreferably for 10-15 minutes at ambient humidity and temperature. Whilenot intending to be bound by any particular theory, it is consideredthat during this step, which is termed herein as pre-proofing,relaxation of internal stresses in a dough piece takes place, and thefermentation process partly takes place leading to formation of gasnucleation sites (bubbles) in the dough matrix. Indicated time(pre-proofing time) from 1 to 60 minutes is selected depending upon thetype of the product to be baked, humidity and temperature of proofingand type and quantity of yeast used in the formulation.

After resting, the dough pieces are exercised. “Exercising” the dough asused herein refers to subjecting the dough to mechanical stresses so asto restructure the dough matrix. Such restructuring may involve reducingthe number of air cells and/or shifting the air cells size distributiontoward larger air cells. In one embodiment, the dough can be exercisedby subjecting the dough to alternating high and low pressure such thatthe pressure differential between the high (a first pressure) and thelow pressure (a second pressure) is between 1 to 20 inches of Hg. Invarious embodiments, the pressure differential between the first and thesecond pressure can be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 inches of Hg. In one preferred embodiment, itis 10-15 inches of Hg. In another embodiment, it is about 10 inches ofHg. In one embodiment, the pressure differential can be achieved byalternating cycles of negative and positive pressure. In this process,cyclic decrease and increase of pressure are practiced, and pressure canbe varied by any means such as but not limited to mechanical pressure,vacuum pressure, gravitational force, etc. The change in pressure can beeffected at different rates. For example, a 5 minute pressure cycle canbe used. The starting point for the pressure cycles can be below theatmospheric pressure (i.e. vacuum) or at atmospheric pressure (about 30inches of Hg) or above atmospheric pressure (i.e., above 30 inches ofHg). The duration of each cycle and the pressure (i.e. increasing ordecreasing with subsequent cycle) is determined by the value of pressureand by the time, which is necessary for the required increase in thevolume of dough piece. For a 4 ounce roll, in one embodiment, a pressuredifferential of 15 inches is used. For larger rolls (7 to 10 oz) agreater pressure differential of 10-20 inches of Hg may be needed.

At least one cycle of alternating high and low pressure is needed. Apreferred range is 1 to 10 cycles. Depending upon the type of breadproduct, the number of indicated pressure cycles could take any valuewithin the range from 1 to 10 (for example, with French bread rolls itis preferable to have from 3 to 5 cycles). It is believed that excessivecycling will damage the dough such as give it a wrinkled surface.Optimization of pressure differential and number of cycles can be doneby routine experimentation. The rate of the pressure change can bevaried. Generally a slower rate is better for preserving the integrityof the dough. In one embodiment, the dough is subjected to a pressuredifferential of between 5 and 20 inches over a period of 1-200 seconds.In a preferred embodiment, the dough is subjected to a pressuredifferential of between 10-15 inches of Hg over a period of 10-30seconds. In a different embodiment, for a 1.5 ounce roll, a half cycleis from 10-20 seconds, while a full cycle is from 20-40 seconds and fora 4.0 ounces roll, a half cycle can be 20-30 seconds. Larger amounts ofdough may require up to one minute for a full cycle. During the higherpressure cycles, the time that the dough is held at the lower pressureis defined here as the lag time. While no lag time is needed for thisinvention, the lag time can be varied from 0 to 5 minutes. Lag time maybe useful for larger dough (4 ounces or more) to enable the core to besubjected to adequate pressure differential. Alternatively oradditionally a slower rate of pressure change will also enable the coreto be subject to an adequate pressure differential.

Pressure differential can be applied to the dough by placing the doughin a container and providing ambient, positive or negative pressure inthe container. The creation of negative pressure is typically done bycreating the desired level of vacuum and positive pressure can becreated by infusing gas such as air into the container

Values of pressure, character and rate of its variation, degree ofincrease in the volume of dough piece could also be different withdifferent cycles depending upon the type of final product to be baked.The volume after the pressure cycling (exercising) is about 2 to 2.2times. Depending upon the type of baked product, the increase in volumeof the final baked product could amount to 3 to 5 times (for example,for French bread rolls the weight of which is 1.5 oz, the requiredincrease in volume constitutes 3.5 times). For example, for a 1.5 oz ora 4 oz roll, the raw dough volume is typically 0.9 to 1.1; the frozenspecific volume (i.e., after exercising the dough and freezing) is 2.0to 2.2 and the final specific volume after baking is 4.5 to 5.7. Thus, ahigh final specific volume is achieved in the present invention eventhough the specific volume after freezing is 2.2 or less (typicallyabout 2). It is believed that exercising the dough enables therestructuring of the dough matrix and creation of air cells such that ahigh specific volume can be achieved after baking.

In one experiment it was observed that for 1.5-oz product, dimensions ofthe dough after various stages of processing were as follows (themeasurements indicated in inches): after rounding: height: 1.08,diameter: 1.91; after resting: height: 1.38, diameter: 2.38; afterexercising: height: 1.47, diameter: 2.63 and after overspray andfreezing: height: 1.63 and diameter: 2.71.

In typical pre-proofing steps, the specific volume is known to be up to3.5. An advantage of the exercising step in this invention is that it isnot necessary to have a high frozen specific volume to achieve a finalbaked specific volume of at least 4 (or in one embodiment, at least 5).Thus, it was observed that in the present invention, the specific volumeof the frozen dough is 2.2 or less, preferably 2 or less. The reducedfrozen dough volume (compared to typical pre-proofing step) requiresless storage space than the typical pre-proofed frozen dough and alsoresults in the frozen dough being storable for a longer period of timethan the typical pre-proofed dough. Yet the frozen dough of the presentinvention can be directly transferred from the freezer to the oven andachieves a similar specific volume as the typical pre-proofed dough.

While not intending to be bound by any particular theory, it is believedthat exercising the dough, at least in part, contributes to theseproperties of the frozen dough. Further, it has been observed thatexercising the dough results in an increase in the number of larger sizecells and a decrease in the number of total air cells. There was nosignificant difference in the degree of roundness of the cells.

At the end of the process, the dough is brought back to the atmosphericpressure. Following this, overspray is used on the dough. It is believedthat an overspray prevents the gelatinization of the surface due toexposure to excessive temperature during baking. If a dough piece isheated in the oven so that the core will reach an adequate temperature,the surface often becomes dry. In these situations, it is beneficial touse an overspray. It is preferable to use an overspray comprising a highmelting point fat, which may be trans fat free. Suitable fats for use inoverspray will have a softening point between 90° F. and 130° F.Examples of suitable fats for overspray includes canola oil,hydrogenated cotton seed oil, partially hydrogenated soy oil, partiallyhydrogenated corn oil, soy oil, butter, and anhydrous milk fat. In oneembodiment, formulations comprising the above fats such as Coffee Richlike emulsions and PAM can be used. The hydrogenated oils have citricacid as a preservative. An advantage of using a high melting pointoverspray is that toppings can be mixed with the overspray melts, thetoppings will get affixed to the dough. As a result, the loss oftoppings, which is generally significant during manufacture and/orstorage, is reduced. In general the range of overspray is 0.1 to 1 g per1.5-oz roll. In one embodiment, the preferred range is 0.3 to 0.6 g for1.5-oz roll (the roll typically has a diameter of 7 cm, corresponding toa total surface area of 65 sq cm not touching the bottom.)

The dough is then frozen by methods known in the art. When freezing thedough, a uniform cooling rate throughout the dough is desirable. Aconvenient method for freezing the shaped dough is by using spiralfreezer (−30° F. to −62° F.). Carbon dioxide or nitrogen optionally maybe used for gradual freezing (0° F. to −10° F.). It was observed thatchanging the core temperature between 5° F. and −10° F. did notsignificantly affect the baked specific volume. Further, blast freezingalso did not significantly affect the baked specific volume of the finalproduct. Blast frozen doughs over 10, 20 and 30 minute periods were allobserved to have a baked specific volume of 4.6-4.7 ml/g.

For prolonged stability, the frozen dough is preferably stored at atemperature in a range of from about −42° F. to about −10° F., morepreferably at a temperature in the range of from about −20° F. to about−12° F. In the frozen state the dough pieces (which represent asemi-finished bakery product) are stored for a desired period of time

Optionally, the shaped dough is topped with at least one topping and/orflavoring prior to freezing the dough. Non-limiting examples of suitabletoppings and flavorings that may be used in accordance with thesemethods, are as set forth above.

The process of the present method results in the production of asemi-finished bakery product (i.e. frozen dough) with a specific volumein the range of 1.5 to 2.2 cc/g This product is ready for baking withoutadditional time consumption on thawing and proofing, ideallysemi-finished products, which are ready for baking directly after theyare removed from the freezing chamber. In this case a baked product ischaracterized by organoleptic characteristics that are typical offreshly-baked bread and a specific volume of at least 4.0 cc/g. In someembodiments, the specific volume of the baked products was at least 5.0cc/g.

In the method of making the dough, scores could be made on the surfaceof a dough piece. Scoring can be done prior to freezing, or after blastfreezing. If done prior to freezing, it can be done both prior tosubjecting the dough piece to the pressure differential cycles, at anystage during the cycles, or after the exercising step prior to freezing.It is convenient to do it for the final products, in case the crust issufficiently quickly formed during the process of baking, while theprocess of rising of a product being baked still goes on. Surface scoresprevent the rupture of the formed crust, providing for the requiredexternal appearance of the finished bread. If the indicated scores werenot made during the production of frozen dough, they could be madedirectly prior to bread baking. The scores are typically 3 to 4 mm deep.

In one embodiment, combinations of exercising, scoring and overspray canbe used. Exercising was observed to be particularly advantageous whenused with a surface treatment such as scoring. Products that aretypically scored include Bolillo, French bread, Italian bread, Hoagie,Sub rolls and Dinner rolls. In another embodiment, exercising can becombined with overspray. In yet another embodiment, exercising can becombined with scoring and overspray with or without pre-topping.

Method of Baking

The frozen dough of the present invention can be baked in a conventionaloven, such as a rack oven. In one embodiment, baking is carried out inan oven that combines different modes of heating. For example, an ovencan be used which can thaw, increase the volume to provide a high bakedspecific volume, and bake a product with desirable crust insubstantially reduced time. Thus, baking could be carried out accordingto any known method (for example, by convective heating, usingmicrowave, infrared or radio-wave radiation, using electro-contactmethod or other appropriate methods or combination of these methods). Itis also possible to use reduced or increased pressure during the bakingprocess, concurrent treatment with vapor or ultrasound is also possible.Besides, joint or successive use of the said actions in any combinationis possible. For example, it is possible to conduct the process ofbaking at reduced pressure alternating microwave and convective methodsof heating.

The frozen dough of the present invention can be stored at 0°-5° F. forat least 3 months. The present invention does not require the use offreezing point depressants.

Example 1

This example provides ranges of components for a French bread dough.

Ingredient Range (% of flour) One Embodiment High gluten flour 100 100Gluten 0-6 4 Compressed yeast  7-14 9 High fructose corn syrup 1-6 5Dextrose 0-2 0.5 PBRI 0.01-0.07 0.05 SSL 0.1-0.5 0.5 ADA 0.005-0.03 0.01 Tolerance Plus with AA 0.1-1.0 0.5 Guar gum 0.1-0.8 0.5 Panodan0.1-0.8 0.4 Soybean oil 0.5-2.0 1.5 Salt 0.5-4.0 1.5 Water 55-75 60

All ingredients were mixed together using a Hobart mixer (Urban Raiff &Sons, Inc., Buffalo, N.Y.). The dough was divided and rounded intoballs. Individual dough portions were then pre-proofed in a proofer. Thepre-proofed rolls were then subjected to vacuum pressure cycles. Foreach pressure cycle, the rolls were increased to the volume of 3.5 timesthe original volume, with a maximum pressure of 17 in of Hg, and thenrevert to the atmospheric pressure. After 3 cycles of pressure changes,the dough was frozen using a blast freezer, and then stored at −20° C.for at least 24 hours. For using the product, frozen rolls were directlyplaced in a rack oven at 375° F. for 13 min. This resulted in adesirable baked product with golden brown color, good crust and crumbstructure, and flavor typical of freshly baked French bread roll. Thespecific volume of the roll was about 4.8 cc/g.

Example 2

The number of air cells were determined for both a 1.5 oz dinner rollmade of dough that was exercised and a dinner roll made of dough thatwas not exercised. Exercising was carried out by subjecting the dough toa 10 inches pressure differential starting at ambient pressure for 3cycles with each half cycle lasting about 10-12 seconds. A center-crosssection of a vacuum-exercised, pre-proofed, frozen dough was cut using asharp knife. The cut cross-section of the frozen dough was examinedunder a stereomicroscope at a magnification of 400×. Caution was takento keep the sample from thawing by means of cold ambient temperatureenvironment. Pictures of three random circular spots (1 centimeter indiameter each) on the cut cross-section of the frozen dough were takenusing a high magnification digital camera. The pictures were transferredto an imaging software (Paxit). The air cells were manually marked andcharacterized for the area and roundness using the software. Resultswere then presented in the form of a histogram. This procedure wasrepeated for dough with similar unit operations except thatvacuum-exercising was not performed.

The results of the experiment (FIGS. 1A, 1B, 2A and 2B) show that withexercising, a higher number of larger air cells are observed. For adinner roll, the total number of air cells without exercising was 137while the total number of air cells for the dinner roll with exercisingwas 73. Therefore, it is considered that the reduction in the number ofair cells is due to coalescing of the smaller cells into larger cells.In addition, the bar graphs for the size of the air cells indicates thatlarger cells were observed compared to if the dough was not subjected toexercise. No significant difference was observed in the degree ofroundness of the cells.

Example 3

The baked product of the present invention was subjected to comparativesensory testing for Chewiness and Flavor. The baked product of thepresent invention was tested and compared to a comparative example. Thecomposition of the doughs were as described in the embodiment inTable 1. However, the processing of the two doughs was different. Thedough of the present invention was pre-proofed for 15 minutes at 95° F.and 95% RH and was exercised as described in Example 2 prior tofreezing, while the dough of the comparative example was notpre-proofed, nor exercised prior to freezing. After freezing, the doughof the present invention was immediately placed in an oven to bake. Thedough of the comparative example was thawed overnight, followed by onehour of floor time and then baked in an oven. The average score on theHedonic scale (1 to 9 points) as tested by 50 panelists were as follows:

Present Invention Comparative Example Overall liking - 6.22 5.68(texture, appearance, flavor) Overall Flavor 6.34 6.0 Chewiness 6.425.98

The chewiness score is considered to be an indicator of higher doughelasticity. It is believed that higher dough elasticity results fromexercising the dough.

1. A method of producing a frozen dough which can be transferreddirectly from freezer to oven without a proofing or thawing stepcomprising: (a) preparing dough by mixing flour having a gluten contentin the range of 10-20%, a lipid source, water, emulsifiers in the amountof 0.05-0.5%, leavening means and stabilizers; (b) forming gasnucleation sites in the dough; (c) exercising the dough by subjecting itto alternating first and second gas pressures, wherein one of the firstor the second pressure is greater than ambient pressure and the other islower than ambient pressure, and wherein the pressure differentialbetween the first and the second pressure is in the range of 1 and 20inches of Hg; (d) allowing the dough to return to ambient pressure; and(e) freezing the dough, wherein the frozen specific volume of the frozendough is less than 2.2 cc/g and wherein the frozen dough can be directlytransferred to an oven producing a baked specific volume of at least 4cc/g.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of forming gasnucleation sites is performed by resting the dough.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the pressure differential between the first pressureand the second pressure is in the range of 10-15 inches of Hg.
 4. Themethod of claim 3, wherein the duration of each half cycle is 10-30seconds.
 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the exercising step isperformed for 3-5 cycles of pressure differential.
 6. The method ofclaim 2, wherein the dough is rested at ambient temperature and humidityfor 5-40 minutes prior to exercising.
 7. The method of claim 2, whereinthe dough is rested at ambient temperature and humidity for 10-15minutes prior to exercising.
 8. The method of claim 1 further comprisinga step for scoring the dough prior to the step of freezing the dough orafter the step of freezing.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein theleavening means is yeast or chemical leavening agents or a combinationthereof.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the yeast is present in therange of about 8-12%.
 11. The method of claim 2, wherein the chemicalleavening agent is sodium acid phosphate or sodium aluminum phosphatewith baking soda.
 12. The method of claim 2, wherein the lipid source isan emulsified oil, a vegetable oil or a flavored oil.
 13. The method ofclaim 2, wherein the stabilizers are hydrocolloids comprising natural orsynthetic gums in the amount of between 0.2 to 1.6%.
 14. The method ofclaim 2, wherein the dough further comprises one or more of thefollowing: flavoring agents and/or coloring agents, sweeteners orartificial sweeteners, oxidants and/or reducing agents, and enzymes. 15.The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of overspraying thedough with a fat composition having a softening point between 90°-130°F. prior to freezing.
 16. A frozen dough prepared by the method ofclaim
 1. 17. A method of producing a baked product from a frozen doughcomprising: (a) preparing dough by mixing flour having a gluten contentin the range of 10-20%, a lipid source, water, emulsifiers, stabilizers,and leavening means; (b) forming gas nucleation sites in the dough; (c)exercising the dough by subjecting it to alternating first and secondgas pressures, wherein one of the first or second gas pressure is higherthan the ambient pressure and the other is lower than the ambientpressure, and wherein the pressure differential between the first andthe second pressure is in the range of 1 and 20 inches of Hg; (d)freezing the dough, wherein the specific volume of the frozen dough isless than 2.2 cc/g, and (e) transferring the frozen dough directly to anoven for baking wherein the specific volume of the baked product is atleast 4 cc/g.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the specific volume ofthe frozen dough is less than 2 cc/g and the specific volume of thebaked product is at least 5 cc/g.